Tuesday, April 29, 2014

Ranking Beatles albums

Awhile ago, Stanek wrote a post ranking the Trek films.  Around that time, I had been reading through a special Rolling Stone edition titled "The Beatles: The Ultimate Album-by-Album Guide" and I got to thinking I would do a similar idea ranking the Beatles albums.  And now, two years later, I finally got around to writing the post.

Why did it take me so long?  Partially because I kept forgetting or delaying. But I also honestly agonized over this.  I thought it would be fun, but then it started feeling more and more like I was trying to pick my all-time favorite Futurama episode (which is obviously the benchmark for tough decisions).

So a few disclaimers that I have to say or else I'll seriously feel guilty about writing this.  First of all, a relatively poor ranking does not in any way mean I hate the album.  Even the worst album is still awesome in its own way.  It's all pretty subjective and based on my personal opinion, so since I generally like the middle-period the most it shouldn't be surprising those do relatively better.  I tried to make the categories fairly broad in range. "Album layout" is based on the CD version, which I realize is different from how they incorporated it onto a record, but to me it was a useful way to quantify how all the songs sort of work together.  "Overall enjoyability" is my way of comparing the albums to one another, since again even the poorly ranked albums I thoroughly enjoy (and since I enjoy them all so much, generally even the lower-ranked albums get a 5 or 6 in that category).  And "Rock and Roll factor" does not necessarily mean "hard rock", as we typically imagine it meaning today; so I would still consider a softer or acoustic song like "All I've Got to Do" or "Norwegian Wood" pretty solid rock and roll.  The "Shout Out" song from each album is either because I feel it's greatness is often overlooked or because it's simply an amazing song.

I tried to be stingy with the 10s, and afterwards I went back through my list and made myself dock each album more points in order to create some more variance.  Interestingly, even with all of that there ended up being groupings of albums that naturally organized into tiers.  It wasn't intentional, but I decided to include the tiers anyway. In the end, I was somewhat surprised where some of the albums ended up when I actually score them based on categories rather than just my gut feeling.

So, after that rather long introduction, here are my personal rankings starting with the worst tier, which is...

4th Tier: Something is Missing...


13. Yellow Submarine
Originality: 7
Re-playability: 2
Rock and Roll Factor: 3
Album Layout: 1
Impact/Longevity: 1
Overall Enjoyability: 2
Total: 16

No surprise here.  It's not really a fair fight to begin with honestly: only six Beatles songs, two of which were already released.  The other side is the classical music soundtrack for the film, not exactly what I would consider Beatles music.  Originality is certainly not lacking, especially considering George wrote 1/3 of the songs (which admittedly amounts to 2 of them).   However, the album was cobbled together and it really shows.  Re-playability is a 2 only because it is so short, and the rock and roll factor was saved primarily by "Hey Bulldog" and George's two songs.  Ironically, "Hey Bulldog" has always been one of their most "rockin'" tunes for me. It's a shame it was stashed away on such a weak album.

Shout Out: "Hey Bulldog"



12. Let it Be
Originality: 6
Re-playability: 2
Rock and Roll Factor: 6
Album Layout: 3
Impact/Longevity:3
Overall Enjoyability: 3
Total: 23

This score didn't surprise me all that much either.  Let it Be is hurt a bit by the fact that it was basically cobbled together like Yellow Submarine, albeit with a little more care.  I guess they were going for a live sound, but it makes a lot of the songs sound sloppy.  And the odd half-songs like "Maggie Mae" and "Dig It" hurt the album layout and make it tough for me to really care, especially with "Dig It" since I think it would have been a decent song had they completed it.  And "The Long and Winding Road" is a little too much for me, although in Paul's defense I guess it was intended to be much more toned down than what the producer Phil Spector made it out to be and in that way I think it could have been a fine song.  Both re-playability and the album's impact are very personalized scores, because I listen to the album comparatively rarely and hence its impact on me is limited.  I should maybe note that I'm referring to the original album, not the Let it Be... Naked version, which apparently cleans a lot of that stuff up.  In the end, it wouldn't change its order in the rankings, though. When you consider all the fighting between the band and that it was their last released album (though much of it was actually recorded earlier than Abbey Road) it's a rather sad way for the Beatles discography to end (ignoring all the compilations and oddball Christmas albums, etc.).

Note: after writing this, I bought a copy of Let it Be... Naked.  It is remarkably better, but overall the album would remain at #12.  Still though - much improved.

Shout Out: "Dig A Pony"



11. A Hard Day's Night
Originality: 8
Re-playability: 3
Rock and Roll Factor: 3
Album Layout: 6
Impact/Longevity: 4
Overall Enjoyability: 6
Total: 30

This album has always been something of a mystery for me: for no particular reason, I've always struggled to really get into it like I do the other albums.  It's a fine record, but something about it has never quite worked for me.  The originality is pretty solid, considering it was their first album devoid of cover songs.  But on the other hand, there isn't a whole lot of variability with the songs.  There's a lot of acoustic stuff, and while I said that doesn't necessarily hurt the rock and roll factor, it kind of does when it permeates the album so much.  That being said, some really great softer or acoustic songs appear on this album, such as "I Should Have Known Better" and "And I Love Her".  In the end, it's an album that's at something of a crossroads in Beatles history and you can definitely see the maturation of their song-writing.

Shout Out: "Things We Said Today"




3rd Tier: Pretty Awesome 

10.  Magical Mystery Tour
Originality: 7
Re-playability: 2
Rock and Roll Factor: 4
Album Layout: 5
Impact/Longevity: 8
Overall Enjoyability: 5
Total: 31

Well, there are unquestionably a lot of unique songs, that's for sure: an instrumental ("Flying"), a song written to deliberately confuse people obsessing over the meaning of lyrics ("I Am the Walrus"), and even a song that borders on show tunes ("Your Mother Should Know").  In a way, though, that is what interrupts the flow of the album for me: the opposite of A Hard Days Night, there are so many different styles of music on one album.  I know most stoner-rock fans would object to its rock and roll factor being 4, and I am sort of torn in that regard, but some of the songs really do stray from rock and roll and just enter into "weird" territory.  That's not necessarily bad, but it's hard for me to get in a rock-and-roll mood that way, especially on a fairly short record.  There's a lot of Paul on this album, and as a result sometimes that makes the album end up more bubblegum or pop-ish; hence you get songs like "Penny Lane" and "Your Mother Should Know".  Some of these songs are great, but they make the record seem disjointed.

Shout Out: "Magical Mystery Tour" (this could be a stretch, but to me this song could be an early example of ska music).



9. Please Please Me
Originality: 4
Re-playability: 6
Rock and Roll Factor: 6
Album layout: 8
Impact/Longevity: 3
Overall Enjoyability: 6
Total: 33

As a kid Please Please Me was always sort of forgettable, but for some reason the older I get the more I love this album.  The history itself is pretty impressive:  recorded in a single day, over the course of a 10-hour session where the band actually practiced and planned songs during their lunch.  Please Please Me is essentially the group's live show and has become a way for me to imagine hearing them play at the Cavern during their early days.  It has that raw, classic rock and roll feel and always seems like the Beatles at their purest.  The re-playability is pretty good because it's such a fast-paced album, but it's hurt a bit by its lack of longevity to me: I was introduced to the album a lot later than most of the others so it took longer to appreciate it, and to me songs like "Chains" and "Boys" work a lot better in a more chaotic, live show setting than on a recording.

Adding to the impressive history of the album, John had a cold during the recording sessions.  You can hear it pretty easily in the shout out.
Shout Out: "Anna (Go to Him)"




8. The Beatles (The White Album)
Originality: 8
Re-playability: 3
Rock and Roll Factor: 10
Album Layout: 4
Impact/Longevity: 5
Overall Enjoyability: 6
Total: 36

If I had to sum up the White Album in one word it would be "chaos".  That's not a bad thing, the album is definitely fun to listen to, but in the end it's what hurts the overall enjoyability for me, because my God the weird songs are distracting.  It also affects how I view the album layout (I also took an extra point off simply for their decision to keep the junk song "Wild Honey Pie" on there).  It's just hard to get into the album when you go from "Revolution 1" to "Honey Pie."  The length of the album keeps the rock and roll factor high for me: there's so many songs that they cancel out the throwaways like "Why Don't We Do It in the Road" and "Good Night".  On the other hand, while I'll gladly listen to some of the songs over again, I almost never play the whole album a second time through due to the length. All the negatives aside, this album has some amazing songs on it, like "Birthday", "Glass Onion", and "I Will".  It was tough choosing a shout out.

Shout Out: "Savoy Truffle"




7. Beatles For Sale
Originality: 7
Re-playability: 9
Rock and Roll Factor: 6
Album Layout: 7
Impact/Longevity: 3
Overall Enjoyability: 8
Total: 40

Beatles for Sale has always been solidly in the middle for me.  It's only weakness is that it doesn't quite have the impact that other albums have had, although it has to be their most underrated record.  All the songs on it are pretty great, with the exception of "Mr. Moonlight", and it has a good mix of classic rock and love songs, with some new songs that made a bigger leap in originality than the previous A Hard Day's Night, in my opinion. There are covers again, but apparently they were rushed during the recording so that can be excused (that sounds like I don't like the cover songs, which isn't the case.  I just meant as far as originality is concerned). Also, the cover songs have a bigger Beatles "twist" to them. I also get this sense that the softer songs are more soft rock than A Hard Days Night as well, but that's pretty subjective I guess. I could re-rank the albums again in 10 years and see a lot of variability, but Beatles For Sale would most likely still be solidly in the middle.  It's a great album.

Shout Out: "Baby's in Black"




2nd Tier: Solid Though-and-Through

6. Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band
Originality:10
Re-playability: 4
Rock and Roll Factor: 5
Album Layout: 10
Impact/Longevity: 9
Overall Enjoyability: 6
Total: 44

If this blog was read by people outside of our circle, this is where I would expect to get some flak and claims that I simply don't know The Beatles.  I love the album, but similar to Magical Mystery Tour it's just sort of all over the place.  That's great, and the theme style is pretty original, but I always feel like the album is slightly distracting.  I'm flexible about what is "rock" music, but it's tough to call the whole middle of the album rock and roll, with songs like "She's Leaving Home" and "Within You Without You". I've said it a million times already, but: both of those songs are amazing and really add to the originality of The Beatles as a whole, but you can't really put them on as background music at a party or something. And while I can and do listen to songs like "Lovely Rita", "Good Morning Good Morning", and "A Day in the Life" over and over, as an entire album usually once through is enough for me. One minor aside, here: say what you want about the movie Across the Universe, but after seeing it I suddenly found myself enjoying "With a Little Help From My Friends" a whole lot more.  Ultimately, this album knocked my socks off the first time I heard it and it ranks ahead of the majority of the pack.  In hindsight, I would have liked to see more John and George on the album, though. (Paul has lead vocals on 7 of the 13 songs).

Shout Out: "Lovely Rita"




5. With the Beatles
Originality: 5
Re-playability: 6
Rock and Roll Factor: 8
Album Layout: 10
Impact/Longevity: 8
Overall Enjoyability: 7
Total: 44

With the Beatles is similar to Please Please Me in that it comes close to a live show and displays the band at their purest, but everything seems up a notch from their first record.  It comes off as thoroughly more rock and roll, albeit very classic rock and roll as opposed to their later records.  Both have the same amount of cover songs, but the original tracks are more developed and advanced. To me the re-playability and overall enjoyability are linked, and that's one of the main strengths of this record: whether I'm attentively listening to each song or have it on in the background, I can replay With the Beatles quite a few times and still get excited when a song like "It Won't Be Long" or "Don't Bother Me" comes up next. And although it's tied with Sgt. Pepper, I gave With the Beatles the edge due to overall enjoyability.  This was one of the first full Beatles albums I was introduced to as a kid, so it has some personal impact for me, but historically it was pretty huge as well.  With the Beatles and Beatles for Sale are the two strongest arguments against people who claim the group's early stuff isn't any good (although I've found that often times the people who say that are stubbornly going to resist anything you say anyway).  As for the shout out song, a hat tip to Rolling Stone's "The Beatles: The Ultimate Album-by-Album Guide" for this: "With the Beatles... leans heavily on double-tracked lead vocals.  It isn't easy to do: The singer must record a second vocal track that is, ideally, a mirror image of the first. All of the Beatles were proficient at it, but on this cover of an obscure song by the Donays, Harrison is positively astounding."  Listen to the pre-chorus. I couldn't have said it better.

Shout Out: "Devil in Her Heart"






4. Abbey Road
Originality:10
Re-playability: 6
Rock and Rock Factor: 10
Album Layout:6
Impact/Longevity: 8
Overall Enjoyability: 7
Total: 47

It might seem odd that Abbey Road and Meet the Beatles are ranked so close together, but to me that just illustrates how varied and amazing their styles of music were.  The originality is pretty outstanding here: very little that seems forced (unlike The White Album), a rare song written by Ringo, a medley at the end, and my favorite Beatle, George, really shining with possibly the two best songs on the album, including my #1 song - "Something". Some may wonder why the album layout isn't higher considering the medley, and perhaps I was a bit harsh but the category took a huge hit with the song "Maxwell's Silver Hammer". Putting it on the album was bad enough, but placing it right after a brilliant song like "Something" is like having an obnoxious alarm jolt you awake from a perfect dream. Lastly, I feel like "Octopus's Garden" is somewhat underrated.  It isn't the greatest song ever, and I used to dislike it a lot myself, but the more I listen to it the more I find myself enjoying it.  The guitar solo is catchy and the lyrics are simple, in a good way.  Sometimes you need a meaningful song like Lennon's "Give Peace a Chance", and sometimes you need something more lighthearted like "Octopus's Garden".

The shout-out would have been "Something", but since I already built it up enough I'll go with a  more "under-the-radar" song:
Shout Out: "Oh! Darling"



1st Tier: Knock Your Socks Off

3. Revolver
Originality: 10
Re-playability: 8
Rock and Roll Factor: 8
Album Layout: 5
Impact/Longevity: 10
Overall Enjoyability: 9
Total: 50

If you had asked me to rank based solely on my gut feeling, I probably would have leaned towards Revolver as my favorite. Even broken down into categories, it's still awfully close to number 1 and probably has been at some point in my life. Whereas the metaphorical dam began to crack stylistically during Help! and Rubber Soul, it flat-out broke with Revolver and they discovered a whole new realm of originality. At the time of ranking them and writing this, though, I feel like the album layout ends up being it's only real shortcoming. It has some of the most unquestionably hard-rock songs they ever released, with "Taxman", "She Said She Said", "And Your Bird Can Sing", and "Tomorrow Never Knows". But it's sort of the randomness of the other songs that throws me off, and they're intermixed at odd places. "Eleanor Rigby" and "For No One" are astounding songs and offer a great change of pace, but there's just slightly too much off-pace stuff for one album. But the reason this record ranks so much higher than one like The White Album is because of the knock-your-socks-off quality of every song, whether it's softer, hard rock, or experimental. The personal impact for me is huge with this record, when as a kid it was almost difficult to fathom its awesomeness the first time I listened to it.

Shout Out: "She Said She Said"



2. Help!
Originality: 7
Re-playability: 10
Rock and Roll Factor: 7
Album Layout: 8
Impact/Longevity: 9
Overall Enjoyability: 10
Total: 51

I do know for a fact that this album has been number 1 for me before, and I could actually see the argument for a 10 in pretty much every category. Trying to be more critical, however, it fell just short of number 1. From first to last the record has a sort of flow to it, and while some songs end up being sort of ho-hum for me (sorry again, Ringo) they all work together to make an album I can just put on repeat and enjoy over and over (ironically, I believe this was one of their albums that was cobbled together rather quickly). Tied to the re-playability is the overall enjoyability, the only album to get a 10 in this category: it's always been my go-to album for when I want to just listen to the Beatles in general, since it fits almost any musical mood I'm in. It's always been slightly disappointing to me that Lennon was always so critical of their work in later years, and the movie Help! and the song "It's Always Love" are two examples of his criticism. To me, it just goes to show you that maybe the artists themselves are sometimes their biggest critics. And, perhaps, that you don't need to have the artist's approval to enjoy their work.

Shout Out: "It's Only Love"

Just for fun, here's the trailer for the movie Help! which ends up being just about as random as the movie itself. Despite the band itself being sort of ambivalent towards the movie, it's been one of my favorites since I was a kid.



1. Rubber Soul
Originality: 9
Re-playability: 8
Rock and Roll Factor: 10
Album Layout: 10
Impact/Longevity: 7
Overall Enjoyability: 9
Total: 53

I knew I had always enjoyed Rubber Soul, but I'm not sure I would have predicted it to be ranked number 1 (again, categorically speaking) until I actually analyzed it. Like Help!, there's an overall flow on this record but I think the band managed to actually take it to another level. The change of pace from song to song works in a complementary way, they experimented with new sounds (like the fuzz bass on "Think For Yourself") without doing it to distraction, and while there are comparatively few of my "all time favorite" songs on this album, it excels in the overall quality of every single track for me. Even the low point of the album, "Run For Your Life", is listenable if you ignore some of the worst lyrics the band ever wrote in their entire catalog (interestingly, I read John hated the song himself and it's one of the few opinions of the band from his later years that I thoroughly agree with: it alone holds the album back to any degree for me). Some may wonder why the rock and roll factor ranked higher than Revolver, but to me it's the same as I mentioned above: when there are experimental or slower songs, they still retain their rock and roll roots. Plus, "Think For Yourself", "Drive My Car", and "The Word" are comparable to most harder rock songs on Revolver. For the past few years, I'm more likely to either play this record on repeat or sit down and listen to it song by song than any other. For that and everything else I mentioned, I crown it as the number 1 Beatles album.

Shout Out: "Think For Yourself"



Considering how long this post is, I actually felt like I've left out so much more that I wanted to include. But as for the rest of the guys here, how do you rank the albums? I would be interested in comparing.

Thursday, April 17, 2014

The week Obamacare won

This may be the week that "Obamacare" became "The Affordable Care Act." With the news that the law will cover more people that expected, cost less than expected, and only get better from here, now seems as good a time as any for the GOP to starting walking back their 5-year-long attempt to associate the law with Obama.

Let's take a look at where we are.

Exchange enrollment has exceeded expectations

The magic number of the 7 million enrollment target (downgraded to 6 million after the website fiasco) hasn't just been met, it's been vastly exceeded.

Obamacare Tears Down Goalposts: 8 Million Sign-Ups
President Barack Obama announced Thursday that 8 million Americans had enrolled in private health coverage under Obamacare -- the final evidence that the law signed up far more Americans than most would have thought possible during the doldrums of last fall.

The uninsurance rate continues to fall.

Enrollment in private coverage through the exchanges (and potentially into private employer-sponsored coverage as well) and in public coverage through the Medicaid expansion has been reaching the uninsured.

Health insurance gains since last fall hit 12 million, survey shows
President Obama’s health law has led to an even greater increase in health coverage than previously estimated, according to new Gallup survey data, which suggest that about 12 million previously uninsured Americans have gained coverage since last fall.

Premiums and ACA costs are lower than anticipated.

All this is going to be cheaper than expected. The price tag of the law has fallen as premiums have come in below projections.

Lower premiums (yes, really) drive down Obamacare’s expected costs, CBO says
The health-care law's expansion of insurance coverage will cost $104 billion less than projected over the next decade, according to revised estimates from nonpartisan budget analysts Monday. Obamacare's lower-than-expected costs will come largely because premiums will be cheaper than previously thought.

The CBO and the Society of Actuaries anticipate only modest premium growth next year.

Despite a few scattered vague predictions of double digit premium increases this year, the general expectation is that premium increases will be historically low.

Smaller premium hikes forecast in 2015 for Obamacare
Insurance premiums under Obamacare are projected to rise less than 3 percent in 2015, a smaller-than-expected jump as the health insurance exchanges enter their second year. 
The CBO and Joint Committee on Taxation released a series of new estimates Monday on the law’s costs and the number of people it will cover.

New data signal smaller jump in health care costs
"The double-rate increases we've been hearing are probably exaggerated," says Dave Axene, a fellow with the Society of Actuaries, adding that there would be wide variation across the country. "That's not what we're seeing from the actuarial organizations — I guess we're being a little bit more optimistic."

The exchanges are about to get more competitive.

This year was only the beginning! Insurers were feeling out what the new marketplaces would be like and the strong enrollment numbers are convincing some to expand their participation in the exchanges and others to enter them for the first time. This is going to be especially important for small markets; for instance, New Hampshire only had a single insurer (Anthem) selling in its exchange this year. By the next open enrollment at the end of this year, that number will have grown to three competing insurers.

Insurers see brighter Obamacare skies 
Health insurers got their first taste of Obamacare this year. And they want seconds. 
Insurers saw disaster in the fall when Obamacare’s rollout flopped and  HealthCare.gov was a mess. But a strong March enrollment surge, along with indications that younger and healthier people had begun signing up, has changed their attitude. Around the country, insurers are considering expanding their stake in the Obamacare exchanges next year, bringing their business to more states and counties. Some health plans that skipped the new marketplaces altogether this year are ready to dive in next year.

Health care quality is improving.

The coverage expansions may be new this year but quality improvement isn't. The ACA has been working on that front for at least 2-3 years now and the results (while not news this week like the stories above are) are worth nothing.

National Committee for Quality Assurance -- State of Health Care Quality
This year [2012] we saw significant improvement in measures included in the Medicare Star rating pay-for-performance program for health plans that participate in Medicare Advantage. Although Medicare Advantage plans have reported on quality and results have been reported to consumers for many years, the Affordable Care Act required the Medicare program to make higher payments to health plans with better quality performance, starting in 2012. In addition to this new program, the Department of Health and Human Services established a demonstration program to complement it, making even higher payments to plans with better performance.

Obamacare Shows Hospital Savings as Patients Make Gains
Less than five months before the Affordable Care Act fully kicks in, hospitals are improving care and saving millions of dollars with one of the least touted but potentially most effective provisions of the law.

More hospitals improve quality of care
A larger number of hospitals are showing improvements in their quality of care said the Joint Commission in its annual report on quality and safety of hospitals.

All Pioneer ACOs improved quality; only third lowered costs
All 32 of the accountable care organizations in the program improved patient care and patient satisfaction against benchmarks, according to results shared with the Wall Street Journal in advance of their public release.

Is Obamacare working? Hospitals finally see drop in readmissions
New CMS figures show that the national rate of 30-day readmissions for Medicare patients dropped to 17.8% in November 2012 after spending years stuck at 19%—and White House officials say the Affordable Care Act deserves the credit.

The health care system is re-designing itself to start holding down costs and improving quality in the long-term.

The bigger question is whether health care reform is taking root to ensure that the system is on a sustainable footing going forward. And the evidence has been mounting that it is.

Do Structural Changes Drive the Recent Health Care Spending Slowdown? New Evidence
Value-based purchasing of hospital services has had a significant impact on hospital behavior. Hospitals are highly sensitive to changes in financial incentives. Movement away from a preponderance of fee-for-service payments is also likely to permanently alter hospital behavior. For instance, emphasis on reduced readmissions has reportedly changed how hospital managers think about care delivery, from the care delivered within their four walls towards coordinating care outside their four walls as they track patients as they return to the community or to various post acute care settings. 
An observation is that hospitals and other providers are being called to change their care delivery models and business models as payment systems evolve. In a general sense this is leading to a re-engineering of care- slow to start with, but gaining momentum over time. The ACA, with its call for CMMI grants, shows the potential magnitude of private and public sector experiments with alternative organizational forms such as ACOs and medical homes in combination with payment system incentives in the form of payments for value, payment bundling and capitation and prompting the health care industry to reconsider delivery models that reduce incentives for volume of care under fee-for- service. As organizational forms and payment models evolve, augmentation of computing powers and more ready access to “big data” claims files emphasizes an ability to better understand the consequences of change in terms of clinical and economic outcomes.
It's impossible to tell what effect any of this will have on the elections this year. While public opinion polling has generally shown that people don't want to scrap the law, it's also usually shown that they don't love it. Six months Five years of negative press will do that. But now that's it rather unambiguously working, will that begin to swing public opinion for the first time? Will these results combine with the general popularity of state-level issues like the Medicaid expansion to overcome the structural challenge the Dems face this year?

Unclear. But what does seem clear is that the ACA isn't going away anytime soon.